Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon, who has not played since 2014, is applying for reinstatement Wednesday, his business manager said.
“Josh is living with me and is in the best place mentally that he has been in dating back years before entering the NFL,” Michael Johnson said. “He has taken the proper steps to treat his issues and has followed a very strict protocol that the league and our team here has laid out for him.
“He’s also in the best shape of his life and feels even better than he did when he had his breakout year in 2013. This will be a special year for Josh and we are all very proud of the way he has taken the necessary steps to turn his life around.”
Gordon spent 30 days in a New Hampshire rehab facility in October.
The Browns have made it clear they are moving on without Gordon, who was suspended for the entire 2015 season for multiple violations of the NFL’s substance abuse policies.
Gordon’s off-field issues began in college. The talented yet troubled wideout was dismissed from the teams at Baylor and Utah for failing drug tests. The Browns selected him in the second round of the 2012 supplemental draft.
The NFL suspended Gordon for 10 games in 2014 for violating the substance abuse policy, and the Browns suspended him for the season finale for missing the final walk-through the day before. The NFL also suspended him for two games in 2013 for violations of the substance abuse policy.
The Browns welcomed Gordon back after the 2015 suspension, but they also drafted four receivers and gave ex-quarterback Terrelle Pryor a full look at the position.
In 2013, Gordon’s second year in the league, he had 87 catches for a league-leading 1,646 yards, but he played in only five games the next season.
INDIANAPOLIS — Kirk Cousins will surprise you. Just when you think you’ve got the Washington quarterback figured out, he does something entirely unexpected and flips your entire perception of his future. Cousins was a mess for years, a turnover machine whose most appealing quality to Washington fans was the simple fact that he wasn’t Robert Griffin. Then, as if it had suddenly occurred to Cousins he might want to avoid throwing interceptions, he stopped: The same quarterback who threw a pick on 4.3 percent of his passes before the “You Like That!” win over the Bucs in 2015 has dropped his interception rate to 1.6 percent since.
Washington franchised Cousins after what amounted to a little more than a breakout half-season in 2015, and Cousins promptly delivered a superb follow-up campaign. He finished seventh in passer rating and sixth in opponent-adjusted QBR while helming an offense that ranked fifth in DVOA. At 28 and with no notable injury history, Cousins made more than enough of a case for a long-term deal.
Quarterback Kirk Cousins would prefer to play for the 49ers and coach Kyle Shanahan next season if he were to be traded by the Washington Redskins, a source told ESPN’s John Keim.
Kirk Cousins makes a lot of sense as the 49ers’ starting QB, but they should not rush to trade for him when they might be able to sign him next year.
2 Related
Surprisingly, what seemed like it would be an expensive-but-routine negotiation to keep Cousins in burgundy and gold is spiraling out of control. And while Washington placed the exclusive franchise tag on Cousins, the stories aren’t going away. Cousins doesn’t want to be in Washington. He wants to leave, likely to rejoin former offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan in San Francisco.
Whether it’s a ploy from the Cousins camp or a genuine desire to leave, Washington’s starting quarterback has decided to essentially take the winnings after a year of betting on himself and double down. Now that he’s one year away from holding all of the cards in unrestricted free agency, Cousins has suddenly become the most interesting player of the 2017 offseason.
If Cousins is serious about refusing to sign an extension in the hopes of leaving town, everything changes, and the impact stretches far beyond D.C. Let’s run through some of the teams (and players) impacted by the Cousins uncertainty, before delving into Cousins’ trade value.
Obviously, the 49ers find themselves in a fundamentally different place if they believe that they’re going to attract Cousins to join their organization after the 2017 season. If San Francisco expects to acquire Cousins next offseason, it won’t be using the second overall pick on somebody like Mitch Trubisky or Deshaun Watson. The 49ers may not have used their pick on a quarterback anyway, but they can either stay put at No. 2 and grab some much-needed help in the secondary or trade down to a team that wants to leap ahead of the Bears at No. 3 for a quarterback.
New 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan tutored Kirk Cousins while he was the offensive coordinator in Washington. Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post via Getty Images
Speaking of the Bears, they probably weren’t in line to acquire Cousins, but they have an easier path to a quarterback with the third overall pick if John Fox and Ryan Pace are so inclined to take one. The Browns are still in the catbird seat and can draft a passer at No. 1 overall, but if the 49ers are out of the market this year, Chicago has a much better shot at landing the guy they want with the third pick. There’s also a veteran option whose price might come down …
The possibility of the 49ers ending up with Cousins hurts the Patriots’ leverage if they’re trying to trade away Garoppolo. Adam Schefter reported on Wednesday morning that New England is not expected to trade the QB right now, but that won’t stop teams from making offers. San Francisco was one of the teams widely expected to be interested in acquiring the promising young quarterback, and if it is out of the picture, Bill Belichick will have one fewer team to negotiate with over the next few weeks. This is a slight plus for teams such as the Bears, Browns and Texans.
Of course, if the 49ers want to be particularly aggressive, they could still try to consummate a trade for Garoppolo this offseason under the idea that they’ll let him play out the final year of his rookie deal and establish his value before franchising the Patriots backup and trading him to the highest bidder. And hey, if Garoppolo plays like a star, maybe Shanahan and John Lynch decide to hold onto Garoppolo after all …
The quarterback draft class
This isn’t good news for the likes of Trubisky and Watson, who are likelier to free-fall down the first round if the 49ers are out of the quarterback race. It is good news, on the other hand, for teams such as the Bills (who pick 10th) and Cardinals (13th), who might be able to grab their quarterback of the future without needing to trade up. (It remains to be seen, of course, whether any of these passers are any good.)
While it’s no surprise San Francisco’s incumbent quarterback decided to opt out of his deal in advance of Thursday’s deadline, his old team’s reported interest in Cousins may still eliminate what would have been one of Kaepernick’s most plausible destinations. It’s entirely possible Kaepernick might have tested the market, found little to his liking, and returned to the only professional organization he has known.
Now, given that the 49ers would be in line to add only a one-year stopgap before going into full pursuit of Cousins, Kaepernick doesn’t really make sense. He just turned down the option to return to the team on what would have been a one-year deal, so it won’t exactly be Kaepernick’s first choice. At this point, Kaepernick will have to look towards teams like the Jets and Browns for long-term stability, while the 49ers will find another short-term solution in 2017.
It seems interesting that the chatter around Cousins hasn’t yet touched the Rams and new head coach Sean McVay. It’s true that the Rams are committed to Jared Goff, whom they drafted with the first overall pick last year, but Goff was drafted under the Jeff Fisher regime and was terrible last season. It’s too early to move on from the Cal product, but if he continues to struggle in 2017, Los Angeles will likely start pursuing plausible replacements for their quarterback of the future.
Kirk Cousins finished sixth in the league in Total QBR last season (71.7). Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
Nobody really knows how Washington might value Goff, but the Rams weren’t the only team who thought Goff was the best quarterback in last year’s draft class. Goff could be part of the return for Cousins in a trade. It’s also true that for whatever Shanahan saw in Cousins, the quarterback only leaped forward once Shanahan was fired and left for Cleveland. McVay oversaw Cousins’ ascension into the upper echelon of pro quarterbacks, and if the Rams somehow scrounged up the assets to trade for the QB, it seems likely McVay could convince Cousins to sign an extension and stay.
A Shanahan raid on Cousins could hurt his father’s former employers in Denver. The Broncos were never likely to have a clear path toward Cousins, but they were the team best-positioned to go after the top of the free-agent class at quarterback this year. They’ll have competition from the likes of the Texans and Bills, but no other organization a stone’s throw from the playoffs can match Denver in terms of cap space ($44.4 million).
John Elway was well-positioned to come away with his pick of the top passers available. Denver is still in a good spot, but now …
The relative cream of the free-agent quarterback crop could benefit from the uncertainty surrounding Cousins. None of these passers would have wanted to go play for the 49ers, with San Francisco possibly serving as a safety squad for Taylor, who remains in limbo with the Bills. (Romo and Cutler might very well have decided to retire before heading there.) They would otherwise have been left competing for scraps after the Broncos made their decision, either settling for competitive teams with major cap problems (the Texans) or middling-to-bad teams with money to burn (the Browns).
Now, though, there’s another team in the picture. If Washington is going to move on from Cousins this offseason, they suddenly become a competitive team in need of a quarterback with money to spend. Scot McCloughan would have $64.5 million in cap room if he traded Cousins away without taking on any additional players, which would leave Washington as a very competitive suitor with Denver for those veteran quarterbacks. Imagine if McCloughan signed Tony Romo and lined him up against the Cowboys twice in 2017! Wouldn’t that be fun?
Cousins for Romo or Cousins for Taylor isn’t a swap Washington would like to make. But if Cousins is leaving, McCloughan could pick up draft picks now while acquiring his replacement quarterback shortly thereafter. What would a Cousins trade look like, though?
The trade
If Washington truly believes that Cousins doesn’t want to be its quarterback, it’s probably best to trade him now. It’s not hard to imagine a fickle Washington fan base turning on Cousins this season in what amounts to a lame-duck campaign in advance of the 2018 offseason, when it will be difficult to retain the wantaway quarterback. Washington would owe Cousins a 44 percent raise and a one-year deal for $34.5 million under the franchise tag next season, which is untenable even if Cousins were an MVP candidate. Not only would Cousins be the highest-paid quarterback in football, he would have a cap hit nearly $10 million larger than any other player in the league.
A trade would make the most sense, but it’s not going to be the sort of franchise-altering deal Washington reportedly wants for Cousins, using the haul it sent to the Rams for the pick it used on Robert Griffin as an example. The economics and leverage are entirely different. When Washington wanted Griffin, it had no way to get the Baylor star besides trading up to the second overall pick. It couldn’t just wait a year to sign Griffin in free agency. Furthermore, Griffin was coming to town on a contract with as many as five cost-controlled years available. He ended up making $21.1 million over four years with Washington. Cousins will top that figure with the first check he gets from another team.
So then, Cousins isn’t going to generate three first-round picks. The Broncos got two first-round picks, a third-rounder and Kyle Orton for a disgruntled Cutler and a fifth-round pick, but Cutler was 25 years old and three years away from free agency when the Bears made their move. Two first-round picks might be a lot to ask. On the other hand, Cousins is more valuable than Alex Smith, who netted the 49ers a pair of second-round picks from the Chiefs when he was traded to Kansas City. Smith didn’t have Cousins’ numbers and was seemingly unnecessary in San Francisco with the ascension of Kaepernick, but he was about to turn 29 and had two years left on his contract. Cousins should be more valuable than Smith.
Cousins’ trade value seems to be in the range of a first-round pick and another less valuable selection, with San Francisco being motivated to make the deal out of concerns that McCloughan will slap Cousins with the transition tag and match the 49ers’ offer in 2018. All first-round picks aren’t created equal, though, and San Francisco would be foolish to send the second overall selection to Washington for Cousins.
A swap of first-rounders makes more sense, with Washington exchanging the 17th pick for the second selection. Chase Stuart’s draft value chart measures that swap as worth 13.6 points of draft capital, roughly equivalent to the 27th selection in a typical draft. The 49ers have two fourth-round picks after picking up a compensatory selection for Alex Boone; maybe they send the 109th selection to Washington and get the fifth-round pick Washington grabbed from the Saints (154) in return. Now we’re up to 15.8 points of draft capital, roughly equivalent to the 19th pick.
The 49ers could finish out the deal by including Eric Reid, who has been an excellent safety at times while struggling with various injuries. Washington has been a mess at safety over the past several seasons, and Reid — in the fifth-year option of his rookie deal — would be a massive upgrade on DeAngelo Hall and Donte Whitner in the defensive backfield. This wouldn’t be fair market value for Cousins, but picking up Reid and what amounts to a mid-first round pick for a player who doesn’t want to be in town and is likely to leave after the season would make sense.
Kirk Cousins does not appear to want to stay in D.C. long term. Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images
The aftermath
For all we know, Washington may end up better off trading Cousins away. The Rams didn’t regret passing up their shot at Griffin. The Broncos were better off without the maddeningly frustrating Cutler. The 49ers did end up missing Smith, but he was seen as far more replaceable at the time than Cousins is now. If Washington can take the money it saves on Cousins and apply it to a deal for Taylor or Romo, it may very well come out ahead on the deal as a whole.
Not really, no. QBR is built on a win expectancy framework and would sniff out Cousins picking up vast quantities of yardage that meant relatively nothing in the scheme of winning football games, and the Washington quarterback still finished sixth in the league there. He was fifth in individual DVOA among quarterbacks, which can be a problematic stat for players but also would point out if Cousins was stat-padding.
To be specific, ESPN Stats & Information can track all the statistics generated by quarterbacks on drives that started with their teams having no better than a 15 percent chance of winning the game. We can compare Cousins in garbage time to everyone else in those same situations. He was the fifth-best quarterback in the league by passer rating on those drives and third in QBR, but Cousins wasn’t accruing yardage by checking down and letting his receivers do the work.
The average pass in that situation traveled 8.5 yards in the air. Cousins’ average throw on these drives traveled 9.3 yards in the air, the seventh-highest mark in the league. In fact, Cousins got virtually no help from his receivers on those throws. They produced an average of 3.7 yards after catch on Cousins’ completions on those 15-percent-or-less drives, which was the lowest mark for any quarterback. There doesn’t appear to be strong evidence supporting the claims of those Washington players.
What’s most fascinating about Cousins right now, though, is what his decision could mean for the future of how players negotiate contracts. The NFL is understandably a risk-averse league; given the incredible attrition rate from injuries, it’s no surprise that players often opt for immediate security over chasing the maximum possible earnings available. (For what it’s worth, players in other American sports with less vicious injury rates, like position players in baseball, often make the same decision.)
Andrew Luck seemed like the first player in years who might have been able to buck the system and go year-to-year while daring his team to continually franchise him at a rapidly escalating rate or send him into unrestricted free agency. Luck took security, taking $75 million over the first three years of a new five-year extension when his 2016 compensation and two franchise tags might have pushed him into free agency after the 2018 season having earned $68.4 million. Luck sold those three extra unguaranteed years on the back end of the deal to the Colts at a total of $64.6 million when he might very well have hit $100 million for those years on the market as a true unrestricted free agent, sacrificing $35 million in possible earnings for $6.6 million up front.
What worked for Cousins won’t work for many others, but don’t think players and agents alike haven’t noticed what has happened here. Had Cousins taken the $16 million per year deal he was offered this time last year, he would have locked in financial security for life but simultaneously settled for a fraction of the sum he’s set to receive over the next several seasons. (He’s also doing just fine for himself financially.) Cousins bet on himself to win and succeeded, and the difference is going to be tens of millions of dollars. He won’t be the last. Now, unless Cousins changes his mind or reveals his doubt to be an enormous negotiating ploy, Washington is going to be stuck between a rock and a hard place with its franchise quarterback. And that’s quite a surprise.
INDIANAPOLIS — Adrian Peterson is, unless he takes a pay cut from the Minnesota Vikings, headed into free agency.
The Vikings informed the former league MVP and rushing champion they would not exercise his option, which included a $6 million roster bonus. And while he and the Vikings have left the door cracked for a return, Peterson will likely join the growing list of marquee players in the free-agency era who have switched jerseys late in their careers.
It’s the way of the NFL world. Even Peyton Manning finished his career in Denver after being released by the Indianapolis Colts. As Peterson moves on to see what his value is as a 30-something running back, it is a time to look at his football resume. Is he Canton-worthy right now?
Only two running backs ahead of Adrian Peterson on the NFL’s career rushing list have not been elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. AP Photo/Andy Clayton-King
Peterson has been framed as a first-ballot Hall of Famer. His numbers are decidedly impressive, but there is a bit of an inconvenient truth with the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Unless you are a longtime franchise quarterback with multiple Super Bowl wins, you are not a lock to get in.
But again, most of the players who weren’t face-of-the-franchise passers usually have waited for Canton far longer than they expected. It’s a numbers game, and it’s difficult to move to the front of the line.
Two running backs — LaDainian Tomlinson and Terrell Davis — are in the Hall’s class of 2017. Davis was a finalist four times, including a five-year gap between his first and second times as a finalist.
Tomlinson was a first-ballot Hall of Famer, so he provides a model for Peterson’s candidacy. Tomlinson finished with 13,684 yards rushing and, like Peterson to this point, did not have a Super Bowl ring.
But the Hall of Fame process is about breaking ties. Decisions are made as the first list of eligible players is trimmed to 25 in the selection process, to the 15 finalists, and finally to as many as five who can be selected for enshrinement.
Will Peterson make it on the first try? Tomlinson had 624 career receptions, 383 more than Peterson, to go with 162 career touchdowns, 60 more than Peterson. Tomlinson’s numbers were certainly first-ballot worthy.
Jerome Bettis, a Hall of Famer who finished with 13,662 career rushing yards, had the same kind of statistical profile as Peterson — he had 200 career receptions and averaged one fewer yard per carry in his career than Peterson’s current 4.9. But Bettis was a finalist for the Hall of Fame five times before he was selected for enshrinement.
In the end, many will characterize Peterson’s Hall of Fame candidacy as a no-brainer. History says so, with 15 of the 21 running backs with more than 11,000 yards rushing having been fitted for a gold jacket.
And Peterson probably will likely get one of his own at some point. It just might take more than one swing.
Covered Vikings for Minneapolis Star Tribune, 1999-2008
It’s fashionable and fun to declare immediate victors after the first few days of NFL free agency. The formula usually goes like this: Teams “win” when they sign well-known players, especially if they set new benchmarks in contract terms, and they “lose” when they fail to address their needs with a well-known player who costs a ton of money.
• FAQs about the franchise tag • Franchise-tag predictions for all 32 teams • Biggest free-agent decisions for all teams
• A free agent every team should sign
A year later, of course, we have a much better idea of who made smart decisions. (Retrospect is the ultimate cheat code for sports analysis!) It shows us whose moves failed for reasons beyond their control and who might have stumbled into good moves. We can even see when a team was saved from flawed intentions.
So as we look ahead at the 2017 market, let’s consider an updated review of five winners and losers from last season’s frenzy.
Winners
New York Giants
The Giants blazed a relatively rare path: a team making tangible improvement on the strength of a free-agent spending spree. It’s impossible to dispute the impact on their five-game turnaround from signing pass-rusher Olivier Vernon, defensive tackle Damon Harrison and cornerback Janoris Jenkins. The Giants’ defense rose in Football Outsiders’ annual DVOA (defense-adjusted value over average) rankings from No. 30 in 2015 to No. 2 in 2016. Along with improvement from safety Landon Collins, that was enough to lift the Giants into the playoffs. They fully guaranteed $90 million to those three free agents, and for at least one year, it paid actual dividends.
Kirk Cousins, Washington Redskins quarterback
By remaining firm on a lowball offer, and then throwing for nearly 5,000 yards as the Redskins’ franchise player, Cousins put himself in position to be the NFL’s highest-paid quarterback whenever he signs a long-term contract. He can now sit back and know that all of the Redskins’ options are favorable to him. They can pay him $23.94 million on the franchise tag in 2017 (and $34.5 million in 2018 if they choose). They can allow him to become a free agent, a rarity for an established quarterback because it would lead to a massive bidding war among quarterback-desperate teams. Or they could offer a monster deal to Cousins that matches the franchise structure. At the very least, Cousins seems to be in position to earn nearly $78 million in the three seasons from 2016 to 2018.
In his first season with the Falcons, Alex Mack made a big impact at center. Dale Zanine/USA TODAY Sports
A couple of major hits helped the Falcons get over the hump and to Super Bowl LI. Quarterback Matt Ryan, receiver Julio Jones and coordinator Kyle Shanahan got most of the credit for raising the team’s offensive DVOA to No. 1 in the NFL from No. 23 in 2015. But center Alex Mack (second-team All-Pro) played an equally significant role and was worth every penny of a five-year deal that fully guaranteed him $20 million. Meanwhile, Mohamed Sanu (59 receptions) was the Falcons’ second-leading receiver and Taylor Gabriel (35 receptions, six touchdowns) was their fourth.
Howie Roseman, Philadelphia Eagles general manager
Roseman raised a few eyebrows when he traded up to draft quarterback Carson Wentz, even after he had re-signed Sam Bradford to a two-year deal (with $22 million in full guarantees) and also acquired backup Chase Daniel to a deal that fully guaranteed him $12 million. But Roseman was able to flip Bradford to the Minnesota Vikings, albeit as the result of Teddy Bridgewater’s freak injury. As a consequence, the Eagles got out from under Bradford’s contract and also recouped a 2017 first-round draft pick. All’s well that ends well.
Oakland Raiders
No matter who else was involved, the Raiders’ 2016 free-agency foray would have been a winner for the simple inclusion of guard Kelechi Osemele. The Raiders paid dearly for him — a five-year deal with $31.1 million in full guarantees — but he helped transform the Raiders into a playoff team. Osemele’s arrival turned a good offensive line into one of the NFL’s best, an under-acknowledged part of quarterback Derek Carr’s MVP-caliber season. Osemele earned first-team All-Pro honors as the Raiders recorded the NFL’s second-lowest pressure rate (18.5 percent) while ranking No. 10 in yards per rush (4.43).
The free-agent spending spree by the Giants, especially on defense, helped the franchise get to the playoffs in 2016. AP Photo/Kathy Willens
Put simply, the Brock Osweiler signing provided one of the worst outcomes in recent free-agent history. Osweiler’s accuracy was brutal, resulting in the NFL’s seventh-worst off-target percentage, and his average of 5.26 yards per dropback was the NFL’s worst. No quarterback was less explosive on a per-pass basis, and the Texans benched him in Week 15. But he is guaranteed $16 million in 2017 whether he plays or not, making it difficult to extricate quickly from the mistake. Osweiler had shown some promise with the Denver Broncos in 2015. But in retrospect, it was in a small sample size (seven starts). Quarterback desperation might be the NFL’s worst toxin.
Cleveland Browns
Although the Browns accurately assessed their situation for 2016 — they were not close to competing for the Super Bowl — they might have underestimated the impact of flushing their roster as aggressively as they did. That was especially true at offensive line, where the decision to move on from Mack and tackle Mitchell Schwartz left them with a weak group that stunted any attempt to develop or evaluate quarterback prospects. Browns quarterbacks were sacked on an NFL-high 10.1 percent of their dropbacks. As a result, the Browns made no discernible progress as a franchise other than accumulating draft picks last season. Allowing receiver Gabriel to depart also seemed short-sighted after he turned into a productive playmaker for the Falcons.
Impatience, many players
The recent salary-cap surge has flooded the market with cash. Nearly $1 billion was available last spring, and that total will increase in 2017. The clear takeaway is that prominent free agents can get better deals on the open market, if they have the patience (and desire) to turn down their incumbent team’s best offers. The best 2016 example was a pair of Broncos linemen. Before the market opened, Derek Wolfe signed a nice four-year deal with $12 million in full guarantees. Later, teammate Malik Jackson received a whopping six-year contract with $31.5 million in full guarantees from the Jacksonville Jaguars. They are not identical players, to be sure. And some players prefer familiar surroundings over top dollar. But there is little doubt where the best money can be found.
Chargers corner Casey Hayward finished with an NFL-high seven interceptions last season. Andy Lyons/Getty Images
To be clear, the Jaguars signed some players with individual talents. Jackson produced 6.5 sacks. Cornerback Prince Amukamara and safety Tashaun Gipson are good players. But when you commit $58 million in full guarantees to a class, you expect immediate improvement. (The group also includes running back Chris Ivory.) Instead, the Jaguars fell back by two games and finished 3-13. Perhaps some of these players will contribute to a big leap in 2017 under new coach Doug Marrone. Until then, however, the Jaguars’ 2016 class must be considered a flop.
Free agency begins on March 9, the start of the NFL’s new league year. The deadline to franchise or transition tag a player is March 1. Here’s more from ESPN.com:
