CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Twenty-four hours after new Washington Redskins coach Ron Rivera unloaded Pro Bowl cornerback Josh Norman from his roster, he unloaded more than 1,000 items he accumulated in nine seasons with the Carolina Panthers.
Only this time it was for charity.
Rivera and his wife, Stephanie, held a yard sale on Saturday at the Humane Society of Charlotte with the entire $30,237 raised going toward a new campus and research facility for one of their favorite charities during their time in the Queen City.
Approximately 3,000 people stood in line for the opportunity to purchase everything from one of the countless T-shirts Rivera had made with inspirational and promotional slogans to the military paraphernalia he acquired working with the USO of North Carolina to the shoes he wore on the sidelines.
Former players Luke Kuechly, Greg Olsen and Cam Newton also contributed items to help the Humane Society reach its goal of $15 million needed to build what vice president of philanthropy Dona Stucker called a facility in a “real bad state of disrepair.”
Even Rivera’s dogs, a full-blooded golden retriever named Tahoe and Sierra, a mixed-breed adopted from this shelter, contributed to the fundraiser with leashes, collars, dog beds and even a dog crate.
It was reminiscent of the annual garage sale former Minnesota Vikings coach Bud Grant held for years.
“I didn’t realize how much stuff we actually had,” Stephanie Rivera said while holding onto Sierra’s leash.
Neither did Ron Rivera, who admitted it was tough deciding what items to keep and what to sale. Among those were items from his first win in 2011, first playoff win in 2014 and win in London this past season.
“This is kind of our swan song, our last opportunity to really say thank you one more time,” Rivera said.
Rivera was fired with four games left in the 2019 season. He left with two NFL Coach of the Year Awards, a 76-63-1 record that made him the winningest coach in Carolina history and what he called “a lot of stuff.”
Fans began lining up for that stuff hours before the noon start. Steve Osment and his family drove five hours from Richmond, Virginia, to participate in the sale.
They didn’t leave disappointed, buying three hats, a toboggan, a sweatshirt, a jacket, a dog bed, a cat bed, tennis shoes, dress shoes and a belt Osment said “I’ve been needing for the past year.”
“We’ve always loved Ron,” Osment said. “We just adopted a dog from a shelter. We like what he’s doing. For everything he’s been to the community and team, we love him and always will love him.”
Rivera, 58, talked a little football before the gates opened. Regarding the release of the 32-year-old Norman, who was also released under him at Carolina in 2016, the coach said that was made in an effort to get younger.
Regarding whether quarterback Cam Newton, rehabbing from Lisfranc surgery, will remain with the Panthers in 2020, Rivera said, “I just know a healthy Cam, I would never bet against him.”
Regarding the retirement of middle linebacker Luke Kuechly at 28, the release of Pro Bowl tight end Greg Olsen and other roster moves by new Carolina coach Matt Rhule, Rivera said: “It’s kind of the turn of the era. Now it’s a time for the new regime to come in and build it their own way.”
Rivera’s focus this day was on raising money with a sale that was spawned by a conversation between Stephanie and Tammy Reid, the wife of
Jurgen Klopp expressed sympathy for long-standing managerial rival Pep Guardiola and his players after Manchester City were banned from European football for two seasons.
“What I can say as a football coach is Man City under Pep Guardiola … play sensational football. I always admire what they do, what he’s doing, what they do, and that will not end in this moment, obviously,” The Liverpool manager told assembled media, including The Guardian, following his side’s 1-0 win at Norwich City on Saturday.
Klopp admitted his “shock” when he learned of Friday’s ruling by UEFA over City’s alleged breaches of Financial Fair Play regulations.
“To be honest, I feel for Pep and the players because, wow, they did, for sure, nothing wrong,” he continued. “They just played football – and sensational football.
“Wherever Pep was, he helped each league to improve football. But then at the end, we all have to respect some rules – and I have no idea if they did or not, but obviously UEFA sees it like this, that they didn’t. And yeah, we will see what happens.”
Manchester City have 10 days to appeal the ban to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The side announced its intention to do so in Friday’s statement addressing UEFA’s decision.
“With this prejudicial process now over, the club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will, therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity,” the statement read.
PITTSBURGH — Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph is calling Myles Garrett’s assertion that he used a racial slur a “bold-faced lie,” and Steelers coach Mike Tomlin is supporting his quarterback.
“1000% False,” Rudolph tweeted after Outside the Lines aired a new interview with Garrett after the NFL reinstated the Cleveland Browns defensive end. “Bold-Faced Lie. I did not, have not, and would not utter a racial-slur. This is a disgusting and reckless attempt to assassinate my character.”
1000% False.
Bold-Faced Lie.
I did not, have not, and would not utter a racial-slur.
This is a disgusting and reckless attempt to assassinate my character.
— Mason Rudolph (@Rudolph2Mason) February 15, 2020
In the interview with ESPN’s Mina Kimes, Garrett said Rudolph used the slur as he was being sacked with eight seconds left in the Thursday night game on Nov. 14.
Tomlin, though, strongly supported his quarterback in a statement issued Saturday morning — an unusual move for a coach who rarely speaks publicly in the offseason.
“I support Mason Rudolph not only because I know him, but also because I was on that field immediately following the altercation with Myles Garrett, and subsequently after the game. I interacted with a lot of people in the Cleveland Browns organization — players and coaches,” Tomlin said in the statement.
“If Mason said what Myles claimed, it would have come out during the many interactions I had with those in the Browns’ organization. In my conversations, I had a lot of expressions of sorrow for what transpired. I received no indication of anything racial or anything of that nature in those interactions.”
Rudolph’s agent and attorney, Tim Younger, said the “defamatory” statements by Garrett exposed him to “legal liability.”
“We waited to hear the entire interview,” Younger said. “Garrett, after originally apologizing to Mason Rudolph, has made the ill-advised choice of publishing the belated and false accusation that Mr. Rudolph uttered a racial slur on the night in question.”
Garrett, who was reinstated by the league Wednesday after a six-game suspension, made the accusation against Rudolph during the interview with Kimes that aired Thursday night during SportsCenter.
“He called me the N-word,” Garrett told Kimes. “He called me a ‘stupid N-word.'”
In the interview, Garrett blamed Rudolph for starting the fight that led to $732,422 in fines and the discipline of 33 players, and said Rudolph used the slur as he was being sacked by Garrett.
Rudolph initially engaged with Garrett on the ground, and then charged at him after Garrett forcibly removed Rudolph’s helmet. Then, Garrett hit Rudolph over the head with it.
“I don’t say the N-word, whether it’s with ‘a’ [or] ‘er.’ To me, personally, [it] just shouldn’t be said, whether it’s by family, friends, anyone,” Garrett told Kimes. “I don’t want to use it because I don’t want [people to] find that appropriate around me for anyone to use.
“When he said it, it kind of sparked something, but I still tried to let it go and still walk away. But once he came back, it kind of reignited the situation. And not only have you escalated things past what they needed to be with such little time in the game left, now you’re trying to reengage and start a fight again. It’s definitely not entirely his fault; it’s definitely both parties doing something that we shouldn’t have been doing.”
Rudolph was fined $50,000 for his role in the incident. He appealed the fine, but it was recently upheld, a source told ESPN.
The Steelers and the Browns were also each fined $250,000.
Garrett first alleged Rudolph used the slur in an appeals hearing with the NFL in an effort to get his suspension reduced, ESPN previously reported. Garrett later said he never intended for the accusation to become public, but said, “I know what I heard.” At the time, an NFL spokesman said the league “found no such evidence” that Rudolph used the slur.
Rudolph strongly denied the allegation in November and called it “totally untrue.”
“I couldn’t believe it,” the quarterback said Nov. 24. “I couldn’t believe he would go that route after the fact.”
On Friday, Manchester City were hit with a two-year ban from European football for breaching UEFA’s Financial Fair Play regulations. Here, theScore explains what these rules are, what City allegedly did, and what happens next.
What is Financial Fair Play?
UEFA succinctly describes Financial Fair Play (FFP) as a means to prove European clubs “have paid their bills.” These include paying outstanding transfer installments, compensating players, and covering taxes.
After the 2011 inception of FFP, further restrictions were added which were designed to prevent clubs from falling into debt. The independent Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) studies financial figures each season to ensure clubs don’t greatly overspend their revenue over a three-year period.
Punishments for breaching FFP have ranged from warnings to disqualification from UEFA tournaments. UEFA also threatens the “withdrawal of a title or award” but has yet to impose this sanction.
An important aspect of FFP which eventually scuppered Manchester City was its restrictions on how much an owner can put into a club to cover losses.
How did Manchester City get found out?
German magazine Der Spiegel published emails and documents in November 2018 which indicated there was financial misconduct happening behind the scenes at the Etihad Stadium. The records dated back to 2014.
City refuted the evidence and denounced the materials as “leaked or stolen,” but Der Spiegel’s exclusive coverage sparked UEFA’s probe into the club’s finances. The formal investigation began in March 2019.
Which rules did Manchester City breach?
The back-to-back Premier League champions were judged to have falsely inflated their sponsorship revenues to disguise the fact Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, City’s owner and an Emirati royal, was providing most of that income.
Figures from the leaked emails suggest City’s main sponsor Etihad Airways funded just £8 million in 2015-16, while the other £57 million to £59.5 million filed as sponsorship revenue actually came from Sheikh Mansour’s Abu Dhabi United Group, the private equity firm which owns the Premier League outfit.
With these inflated revenues, City allegedly deceived the CFCB into thinking the club had the financial wriggle room to pay big wages and large transfer fees without breaching FFP rules.
Are Financial Fair Play rules actually fair?
“The aim of financial fair play is not to make all clubs equal in size and wealth, but to encourage clubs to build for success rather than continually seeking a ‘quick fix,'” UEFA states.
Ensuring clubs are sustainable can’t be a bad thing, but there has been criticism that FFP reinforces teams’ statuses. Financial imbalance had already created a deep fissure in the European game, so imposing restrictions that are aligned to clubs’ revenues ensured the big stay big. With FFP, smaller sides are extremely unlikely to break into the European elite with their tighter budgets.
“Had UEFA introduced regulations like FFP 20 years earlier, I think it would have made a notable difference,” sports writer and broadcaster David Goldblatt said in Miguel Delaney’s “How modern football became broken beyond repair” feature for the Independent. “And I think it would have been a deterrent to more egregious foreign owners who have lots of money and political aims.”
Did Manchester City shoot themselves in the foot?
In some ways, yes.
City were accused of arrogance during UEFA’s investigation. They first described the process as a deliberate ploy “to damage the club’s reputation” and The Guardian’s David Conn reports City were “hostile and confrontational” throughout. They also apparently submitted inconsistent answers during the investigation.
City asked the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to stop the probe and even lodged a damages complaint against UEFA. But both pleas failed. The first appeal against the investigation was denied and was followed up by the independent investigatory chamber recommending UEFA sanction the club.
The club had previously broken FFP rules. A UEFA investigation in 2014 found City guilty of breaching the regulations, so the European football’s administrative body subsequently restricted the size of Manuel Pellegrini’s squad for the 2014-15 Champions League campaign.
What happens next?
Manchester City have already appealed the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). A City statement described the UEFA investigation as “flawed and consistently leaked” and stressed the need for an impartial judgment on “a case initiated by UEFA, prosecuted by UEFA, and judged by UEFA.”
This could drag on for a while.
Meanwhile, the €30-million fine due from City will be distributed to other European clubs. UEFA’s website says these solidarity payments will follow “an agreed formula,” but admits that formula is yet to be decided on by the organization and its executive committee.