The British government has until Tuesday to produce the travel waivers that UEFA requires in order to move the Champions League final from Istanbul to London’s Wembley Stadium, according to Rob Harris of The Associated Press.

If UEFA’s demands aren’t satisfied, Harris reports the final between English clubs Chelsea and Manchester City could be played in Portugal instead.

UEFA set the deadline after failing to find a resolution during talks with the British government on Monday. The European football governing body reportedly wants guarantees that Champions League sponsors, guests, and media are exempted from quarantine rules when they arrive in England.

London is thought to be UEFA’s preferred relocation, but Porto is among alternatives if issues aren’t resolved.

The Champions League final is scheduled to take place in the Turkish capital on May 29, but concerns about travel restrictions have emerged due to a spike in COVID-19 cases in the country.

Turkey is on England’s “red list” of high-risk nations, while Portugal is on the “green list,” which is comprised of 12 low-risk countries where travelers would not be required to quarantine upon their return.

British Prime minister Boris Johnson spoke about the prospect of England hosting the final over the weekend, saying, according to Reuters, “It would be a great shame if fans were unable to attend.”

Britain will begin to ease lockdown restrictions next Monday – it’s understood 10,000 fans could be allowed at Wembley Stadium, according to Paul MacInnes of The Guardian.

However, the British government may have to consider allowing 25,000 fans – the same number that UEFA expected at the Ataturk Stadium in Istanbul – in order to ensure the match is played in London, per MacInnes.

Another potential obstacle surrounding a London relocation is that the Championship playoff final is currently scheduled to be played at Wembley on the same day. The English Football League will expect to be allowed a similar crowd of 25,000 at Wembley if it has to reschedule the Championship playoff final, MacInnes adds.

Before the all-English final was confirmed, UEFA insisted it was not considering relocating the showpiece match despite growing COVID-19 concerns in Turkey at the end of April.

Turkey’s lockdown is set to end on May 17.

It took until the eighth minute for Sergio Ramos to do Sergio Ramos things. The Spaniard strutted down his well-trodden path between excellent defending and grievous bodily harm as he disregarded the ball and shoved Timo Werner aside, letting possession roll into the hands of Thibaut Courtois and the Chelsea forward crash into the advertising hoardings.

It was streetwise. It was ruthless. It was Zinedine Zidane’s Real Madrid.

But Wednesday’s Champions League elimination to Chelsea could signal the end of that era for the club. Real Madrid lurked with the nonchalance of a grizzled predator in Wednesday’s second leg, seemingly ready to snap or claw when an opportunity arose. But it didn’t. The Blues had the energy to evade and loot an aging team that could finish a campaign without a meaningful trophy for the first time since the 2009-10 term. On this occasion, experience didn’t prevail.

The past decade has brought four Champions Leagues, three La Liga titles, and a sack of other silverware into the Santiago Bernabeu, and much of that success was earned with the same spine – save for additions like Toni Kroos and, of course, the 2018 departure of Cristiano Ronaldo. But now, the Real Madrid rebuild is long overdue.

Whether Zidane is the man to oversee this transition is up for debate.

There were plenty of busts and downright average signings since August 2005, but the above group is still present and has underpinned Los Blancos’ success at a cost of around €181 million. Florentino Perez’s posturing for a Super League and egregious soundbites deserve criticism, yet these investments – for players who weren’t Galacticos before their respective arrivals – merit praise. Only Marcelo was signed while Perez wasn’t president.

The team will soon look very different. Ramos’ contract expires at the end of the season, while Karim Benzema, Dani Carvajal, Isco, Marcelo, Luka Modric, and Raphael Varane all hold deals that expire a year later. The average age of the full nine-man ensemble will be almost 31-and-a-half when Marcelo celebrates his 33rd birthday next week.

And there’s hardly a hint that Madrid are entering a new cycle. Courtois and Ferland Mendy logged the most minutes for Real Madrid in their Champions League campaign, but immediately below them were Kroos, Modric, Benzema, Casemiro, and Varane. Ramos missed three group games and four knockout matches through injury, but his continued influence over this team is unquestionable. Since the start of the 2018-19 season, Real Madrid have won 67% of their Champions League matches with Ramos in the team and 31% without him.

Zidane’s loyalty toward these players is understandable given the gold rush that’s defined his reigns. But the fierceness of that loyalty has come at the cost of some of the veterans’ would-be successors. Marcos Llorente left in search of first-team football and is now a terrace hero at Atletico Madrid. Sergio Reguilon was excellent on loan at Sevilla but he was offloaded to Tottenham Hotspur. Letting Achraf Hakimi join Inter Milan was a baffling decision. Martin Odegaard was called back from a spell with Real Sociedad but, after being starved of minutes in Madrid, he pushed for a loan to Arsenal.

There are more. It would be a surprise to see Luka Jovic, Dani Ceballos, or Brahim Diaz in the famous white shirt again. Vinicius Junior and Rodrygo are both just 20, but it wouldn’t be too harsh to suggest the Brazilian duo should have been more crucial to Real Madrid’s starting XI at this stage.

Zidane has maintained success at Real Madrid until this point. However, to start afresh – without Ramos flooring a forward and Benzema incessantly bashing efforts on goal – is a venture into the unknown for the French boss.

And so far, there’s been little to suggest that he’s a man willing or able to undertake that challenge.

Nine of the 12 clubs that attempted to launch the European Super League made amends with UEFA on Friday by formally ditching the project.

Each of the nine clubs submitted a “club commitment declaration” to reintegrate, UEFA said in a statement.

Barcelona, Juventus, and Real Madrid have yet to concede ground and now face action from UEFA’s disciplinary bodies.

The other nine clubs – AC Milan, Arsenal, Atletico Madrid, Chelsea, Inter Milan, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Tottenham – will forfeit 5% of any revenue they receive from UEFA for one season. They’ll also face fines of up to €100 million if they attempt to break away in the future.

Additionally, the teams will contribute a combined €15 million to children’s and grassroots football.

“These clubs recognized their mistakes quickly and have taken action to demonstrate their contrition and future commitment to European football,” UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin said. “The same cannot be said for the clubs that remain involved in the so-called Super League, and UEFA will deal with those clubs subsequently.”

Ceferin previously threatened to ban any team that refuses to renounce the Super League from future Champions League and Europa League competitions.

Madrid, along with bitter rivals Barcelona and Italian side Juventus, are now threatening to pursue legal action against the teams that abandoned the project, according to The New York Times’ Tariq Panja.

Madrid president Florentino Perez said the 12 clubs couldn’t officially withdraw from the Super League because they had signed “binding contracts.”

However, the withdrawal of nine clubs can force the termination of the Super League, according to a contract obtained by The New York Times.

The Super League collapsed within two days of its announcement on April 18. England’s Big 6 clubs reversed course after intense backlash from fans, former players, and politicians. Milan, Inter, and Atletico Madrid soon followed.