When the Seattle Seahawks pulled off a surprise trade for tight end Jimmy Graham in March of 2015, general manager John Schneider said the reasoning behind the move was his belief that there are “no finish lines” to building a championship-caliber team.

At the time, the Seahawks were coming off back-to-back Super Bowl appearances and had come within a yard of repeating as champions. They could have stood pat, but Schneider believed that as good as his team already was, acquiring a weapon like Graham would make it even better, even at the cost of a first-round pick plus starting center Max Unger.

The same roster philosophy led the Seahawks to make their latest blockbuster move, a trade for defensive tackle Sheldon Richardson in exchange for a package that includes Seattle’s second-round pick in 2018.

That’s not to say Richardson is entirely a luxury addition. The Seahawks could use a difference-maker at defensive tackle with top pick Malik McDowell potentially unavailable for his entire rookie season, if not longer, following an ATV accident. But Seattle’s defense already featured seven Pro Bowlers, including two on their defensive line in addition to Frank Clark, who’s coming off a 10-sack season. This was not a move they had to make, but Schneider made it anyway.

The same was true with Percy Harvin in 2013, when Seattle already had Doug Baldwin, Golden Tate and Sidney Rice in its receiver corps plus a Pro Bowl kick returner in Leon Washington. Seattle gave up its first-round pick and signed Harvin to what at the time was the richest contract in franchise history. He couldn’t fit into the Seahawks’ offense nor their locker room and was dumped 19 months later.

When the Seahawks traded for Graham the following offseason, it showed that the Harvin flop didn’t leave Schneider at all gun-shy when it comes to making bold moves.

Schneider and the Seahawks’ front office take great pride in how aggressively they pursue potential personnel acquisitions, even if they never materialize.

“That’s kind of how we got guys like Ahtyba Rubin here, Cliff Avril, Michael Bennett,” Schneider told 710 ESPN Seattle in 2016. “That’s how we acquired those guys a little bit later on, just by being aggressive in terms of staying in deals. Now, we walk away from, shoot, I would say like 70 percent of them, maybe 80 percent.”

The Richardson trade was one of those moves they stuck with until the end.

The Seahawks’ defense would have still been among the NFL’s best without him. But as Schneider has shown, he doesn’t believe in leaving well enough alone.

There are no winners in the wake of Diego Costa’s wantaway demands.

As expected, the bullish striker wasn’t on the list of names in Chelsea’s roster for the 2017-18 Champions League campaign. Both logic and sentiment play into that decision; Blues boss Antonio Conte doesn’t want Costa in the locker room, and cup-tying him would turn off Atletico Madrid from the move entirely.

Costa’s attempts to orchestrate a return to Diego Simeone’s side extend as far back as last January, but nothing could be done in 2017 due to the club’s transfer ban. For the next four months, each party involved must sit and wait, all equal losers in a sour situation with no real happy ending.

Conte’s reported text message to Costa deeming him surplus to requirements at Chelsea was a poor decision on the Italian tactician’s part. If Costa wasn’t to be the long-term option, they should have worked together to reach an amicable solution for the months leading up to January. Chelsea’s depth is an issue and Costa could have played in the FA or League Cup. A loan move wasn’t arranged, either.

Instead, Conte showed his hand as a man who does not react well to being slighted. While he maintained publicly that he was focused on the bigger picture – and, to be fair, was rewarded with a Premier League trophy – he did not do himself any favours in handling Costa dismissively. You can bet Chelsea’s players took note of the whole affair and will keep it in mind moving forward.

Costa is currently in Brazil, in a sort of protest leave, with the club asking him to return and reportedly considering legal action against him if he does not. It’s the last thing Chelsea’s business side needs to be thinking of as the organization continues paying the considerable wages of a player who is not even in the country – not that Chelsea is cash-strapped, but if this arrangement doesn’t change, the club will take an even greater loss on his fee.

Atletico might be the only winner of the bunch by gaining a player for a reduced figure, but that price may come with the caveat that Costa won’t be ready to contribute right away. With Antoine Griezmann also potentially departing next year, Atletico would probably prefer to spend a bit more for match fitness.

While Costa will be hungry to prove his doubters wrong, he won’t launch his personal crusade on solid footing if he spends the next few months in exile. It’ll be even tougher if he’s dealing with fitness concerns, multiple fines, and legal problems.

Fellow wantaway stars Philippe Coutinho and Alexis Sanchez might not have secured their own moves away either, but they’ll be in shape for the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Costa was snubbed from Julen Lopetegui’s latest roster in favour of David Villa and isn’t exactly guaranteed a spot next summer.

Come January, an out-of-form Costa will probably sport the red-and-white stripes of Atletico once again. Conte will have moved on as he learns how best to use Alvaro Morata. The two clubs will have completed a deal where neither got what it really wanted, and Spain will continue to prepare without Costa in mind.

Life and football will go on regardless of Costa’s murky circumstances, but January can’t come soon enough for any of the parties involved.

(Photos courtesy: Action Images)