The Pittsburgh Steelers and Antonio Brown have reached agreement on a four-year, $68 million deal that makes him the highest-paid wide receiver in the NFL, sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter.
He is now tied to the Steelers through the 2021 season. He tweeted after he signed his new deal, which is front-loaded with Brown standing to make less money in the fourth and final year of the extension. The breakdown: Brown will make $18.5 million in the first three-years of the contract and $12.5 million in the fourth, sources told Schefter.
Steelers for life #Boomin pic.twitter.com/LYcCi4fW8U
— Antonio Brown (@AntonioBrown) February 27, 2017
The Steelers announced the extension as a five-year deal. Brown contract for the 2017 season, with a scheduled base salary of $4.7 million, stands as is, the sources told Schefter.
The Steelers had promised to rework Brown’s contract this offseason. They restructured his contract last August, advancing $4 million of his 2017 salary into his base salary for 2016.
Brown, 28, is considered one of the best receivers in the league and has been a key piece of the Steelers’ offense for the past several seasons. He had one year left on a five-year, $42 million contract he signed in 2012.
A 2010 sixth-round pick out of Central Michigan, Brown has been to five Pro Bowls and has earned three first-team All-Pro nods in his seven seasons. He led the league with 1,698 receiving yards in 2014.
He is the first player in Steelers history to finish with 1,000 receiving yards and 10 receiving touchdowns in three straight seasons.
Brown drew the ire of Steelers coach Mike Tomlin for posting a Facebook Live video from the locker room after a win against the Chiefs in the divisional round of the playoffs that caught Tomlin’s postgame speech, but the incident appears to have been put to rest.
ESPN’s Katherine Terrell contributed to this report.
The reality of the situation continues to be apparent: It’s hard to see the marriage between Kirk Cousins and the Washington Redskins lasting beyond 2017. His price tag remains high; their love for him has a financial ceiling. And neither side appears willing to budge from its stance.
This really isn’t a case of both sides wanting to break away from each other. According to multiple people, Cousins likes playing in Washington. According to multiple people in the organization, the team truly likes Cousins. But the leverage Cousins enjoys isn’t about to change, and the Redskins clearly aren’t prepared to pay him what he thinks he can get.
That’s why with all the options as to what can happen if he’s tagged by Wednesday’s deadline, one has a higher percentage of happening: a trade. The NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah said last week that he thought there was a better chance that Cousins would be traded than that he would return. It’s hard to argue against that, and some close to Cousins say that’s what the Redskins want to do anyway, knowing that signing him to a long-term deal will be difficult. It may even be impossible, given their different positions on what his ability is worth.
As of now, some in his camp view any deal reached at the July 15 deadline as an impossibility. It certainly would take an increased offer by Washington. I don’t know that this is a universal opinion in Cousins’ camp, but the point is that based on the Redskins’ actions to date, there’s no reason to believe their offer will increase that much. They clearly view him as good, not great. And there’s no reason for Cousins to lower what he believes he should get.
The Redskins’ problem is that there’s only one team Cousins will sign with right now, according to one source: San Francisco. So Washington doesn’t have much bargaining power with other teams. This isn’t just about Cousins maximizing his financial value; it’s about putting himself in the best position. Reuniting with a coach (Kyle Shanahan) who loves you in an offense you love? That’s a win-win for Cousins. But it’s a tough way for the Redskins to maximize his trade value on the market.
Therefore, with a trade, the Redskins can get what they can for a player they’ll lose in a year anyway. Of course, if Cousins plays under the tag, he’s gambling that San Francisco – a preferred destination with Shanahan in charge – still will need a quarterback next year. But with a six-year contract, Shanahan can afford to wait. Use the picks this year on other spots knowing the quarterbacks will arrive in 2018.
It’s hard to say the Redskins definitely will trade him; it’s not hard to say they will try. With the combine starting this week – and agents in touch with teams – Cousins and his side should have a good sense of what San Francisco might do. If he signs the franchise tag right away, or within a few days, it likely means he knows what will – or won’t – happen. Cousins also knows a year from now he’ll be free.
The transition tag idea for 2018 at around $28 million has been floated. It’s not realistic. So if Cousins leaves after 2017, then the Redskins would get a third-round compensatory pick in 2019. If they can get a good return from the 49ers this offseason, it’s hard to imagine them saying no. Quite a bit of work remains for this situation to be resolved, whether via trade or anything else. But for the marriage to continue, the first step would be a willingness on both sides to alter their position.
The first round of the 2017 NFL draft has been set since Super Bowl LI’s epic finish, but the league has now released the complete draft order for April’s draft, with one exception: the Colts and Vikings still need to flip a coin to determine their picks in the middle of each round. The coin flip is expected to happen at the NFL combine, which begins this week.
Check out the full list below.
Three teams were forced to forfeit picks:
Note: An asterisk denotes the pick is a compensatory selection.
1. Cleveland Browns 2. San Francisco 49ers 3. Chicago Bears 4. Jacksonville Jaguars 5. Tennessee Titans (from Los Angeles Rams) 6. New York Jets 7. Los Angeles Chargers 8. Carolina Panthers 9. Cincinnati Bengals 10. Buffalo Bills 11. New Orleans Saints 12. Cleveland Browns (from Philadelphia Eagles) 13. Arizona Cardinals 14. Indianapolis Colts OR Philadelphia Eagles (from Minnesota Vikings) 15. Indianapolis Colts OR Philadelphia Eagles (from Minnesota Vikings) 16. Baltimore Ravens 17. Washington Redskins 18. Tennessee Titans 19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 20. Denver Broncos 21. Detroit Lions 22. Miami Dolphins 23. New York Giants 24. Oakland Raiders 25. Houston Texans 26. Seattle Seahawks 27. Kansas City Chiefs 28. Dallas Cowboys 29. Green Bay Packers 30. Pittsburgh Steelers 31. Atlanta Falcons 32. New England Patriots
Round 2
33. Cleveland 34. San Francisco 35. Jacksonville 36. Chicago 37. Los Angeles Rams 38. Los Angeles Chargers 39. New York Jets 40. Carolina 41. Cincinnati 42. New Orleans 43. Philadelphia 44. Buffalo 45. Arizona 46. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 47. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 48. Baltimore 49. Washington 50. Tampa Bay 51. Denver 52. Cleveland (from Titans) 53. Detroit 54. Miami 55. New York Giants 56. Oakland 57. Houston 58. Seattle 59. Kansas City 60. Dallas 61. Green Bay 62. Pittsburgh 63. Atlanta 64. New England
The annual scouting combine kicks off this week in Indianapolis, and 300 players will audition in front of NFL coaches, scouts and GMs. Check out ESPN.com’s coverage of the event.
1 Related
65. Cleveland 66. San Francisco 67. Chicago 68. Jacksonville 69. Los Angeles Rams 70. New York Jets 71. Los Angeles Chargers 72. Carolina 73. Cincinnati 74. Philadelphia 75. Buffalo 76. New Orleans 77. Arizona 78. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 79. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 80. Baltimore 81. Washington 82. Denver 83. Tennessee 84. Tampa Bay 85. Detroit 86. Minnesota (from Dolphins) 87. New York Giants 88. Oakland 89. Houston 90. Seattle 91. Kansas City 92. Dallas 93. Green Bay 94. Pittsburgh 95. Atlanta 96. New England 97. Miami* 98. Carolina* 99. Baltimore* 100. Tennessee (from Rams)* 101. Denver* 102. Seattle* 103. New England (from Browns)* 104. Kansas City* 105. Pittsburgh* 106. Seattle* 107. New York Jets*
Round 4
108. Cleveland 109. San Francisco 110. Jacksonville 111. Chicago 112. Los Angeles Rams 113. Los Angeles Chargers 114. Washington (from Jets) 115. Carolina 116. Cincinnati 117. Chicago (from Bills) 118. New Orleans 119. Philadelphia 120. Arizona 121. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 122. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 123. Baltimore 124. Washington 125. Tennessee 126. Tampa Bay 127. Denver 128. Detroit 129. Minnesota (from Dolphins) 130. Oakland 131. Houston 132. Kansas City 133. Dallas 134. Green Bay 135. Pittsburgh 136. Atlanta 137. New England 138. Cincinnati* 139. Philadelphia (from Browns)* 140. New York Giants 141. Los Angeles Rams* 142. Cleveland* 143. San Francisco* 144. Indianapolis*
Round 5
145. Cleveland 146. San Francisco 147. Chicago 148. Jacksonville 149. Los Angeles Rams 150. New York Jets 151. Los Angeles Chargers 152. Carolina 153. Cincinnati 154. Washington (from Saints) 155. Philadelphia 156. Buffalo 157. Arizona 158. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 159. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 160. Baltimore 161. San Francisco (from Redskins) 162. Tampa Bay 163. New England (from Broncos) 164. Tennessee 165. Detroit 166. Miami 167. New York Giants 168. Oakland 169. Houston 170. Kansas City 171. Buffalo (from Cowboys) 172. Green Bay 173. Pittsburgh 174. Atlanta 175. Cleveland (from Patriots) 176. Cincinnati* 177. Denver* 178. Miami* 179. Arizona* 180. Kansas City* 181. Cleveland* 182. Green Bay* 183. New England* 184. Miami*
Round 6
185. Cleveland 186. San Francisco 187. Jacksonville 188. Houston (from Bears) 189. Los Angeles Rams 190. Los Angeles Chargers 191. New York Jets 192. Carolina 193. Cincinnati 194. Philadelphia 195. Buffalo 196. New Orleans 197. Arizona 198. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 199. Indianapolis OR Minnesota 200. Baltimore 201. Washington 202. San Francisco (from Broncos) 203. Denver (from Titans) 204. Tampa Bay 205. Detroit 206. Miami 207. New York Giants 208. Oakland 209. Washington (from Texans) 210. Seattle 211. Dallas 212. Green Bay 213. Pittsburgh 214. Tennessee (from Falcons) 215. Detroit (from Patriots) 216. Kansas City* 217. Cincinnati* 218. Kansas City*
Round 7
219. San Francisco (from Browns) 220. Washington (from 49ers) 221. Chicago 222. Jacksonville 223. Los Angeles Rams 224. New York Jets 225. Los Angeles Chargers 226. Seattle (from Panthers) 227. Cincinnati 228. Dallas (from Bills) 229. New Orleans 230. Philadelphia 231. Arizona 232. Carolina (from Colts through Browns OR Vikings) 233. Carolina (from Colts through Browns OR Vikings) 234. Los Angeles Rams (from Ravens) 235. Washington 236. Tennessee 237. Tampa Bay 238. Denver 239. New England (from Lions) 240. Miami 241. New York Giants 242. Oakland 243. Houston 244. Oakland (from Seahawks) 245. Kansas City 246. Dallas 247. Green Bay 248. Pittsburgh 249. Atlanta 250. Detroit (from Patriots) 251. Cincinnati* 252. Denver* 253. Denver*
Permitting Alshon Jeffery to reach free agency hurts the Chicago Bears on multiple levels.
Say what you want about Jeffery’s past two seasons — derailed because of injuries and suspension — but he’s an accomplished and coveted player. Jeffery averaged 72.2 receiving yards per game for the Bears; only Brandon Marshall (78.3) averaged more per game in team history (32-game minimum). Wide receivers like Jeffery, 27, rarely hit free agency — most teams go out of their way to extend No. 1 receivers. There will be substantial interest in Jeffery’s services beginning March 9, and the Bears’ reluctance to engage in any recent meaningful contract talks puts them at a disadvantage. Jeffery wants to play for a contender and will strongly explore all options.
Without Jeffery, the Bears are vulnerable at wide receiver.
Third-year receiver Cameron Meredith is coming off an impressive season, but no one is ready to anoint him a No. 1.
The Jeffery decision creates a gaping hole on the depth chart. The Bears have to get serious about pursuing receivers in free agency and the draft, but will any be better than Jeffery? Remember, Jeffery has 13 career 100-yard receiving games. And from 2013-14, Jeffery combined for 174 receptions, 2,554 yards and 17 touchdowns.
That’s not easy production to replace.
Yes, $17.5 million is a large salary-cap number for one player to carry. But Chicago is positioned to be in the top five in cap space (the cap is also expanding), and that is before $13 million is cleared with the expected release or trade of Jay Cutler.